<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701</id><updated>2011-07-28T11:17:44.823-05:00</updated><category term='photography'/><title type='text'>Ulysses at Large</title><subtitle type='html'>Comments about matters trivial - and quadrivial - by William Porter</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>64</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7521522029206875310</id><published>2010-01-20T14:33:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-27T16:18:09.427-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Macjournal review by WP</title><summary type='text'>MacJournal makes an excellent front-end your online blog. You can take advantage of its great text editing features, drag and drop media such as photos or podcasts, and click a button when you are done to publish your entry directly to your blog.Photos can easily be resized right in MacJournal.​You can also print MacJournal entries very easily.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7521522029206875310'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7521522029206875310'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2010/01/macjournal-review-by-wp.html' title='Macjournal review by WP'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh5.ggpht.com/_E63StVg0FS8/S2C7mBAIn4I/AAAAAAAAa2s/TmuOOQhD2TQ/s72-c/20100121-172025-8518.KmeLvvahwuFF.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7580751159196888804</id><published>2009-10-15T17:25:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-15T17:52:31.268-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Upgrading my laptop's hard disk: Postscript to the addendum</title><summary type='text'>In my last post, I said: [I]t's a mistake to think you can simply clone an 80GB drive to a 500GB drive, swap the drives, and go about your business. An old friend who is a fan of the Mac writes to say that, on a Mac, assuming the drive was not corrupted and the clone itself isn't corrupted, then this is exactly what you could do. Maybe. It would seem to be possible to do this on a PC, as well. At</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7580751159196888804'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7580751159196888804'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/10/upgrading-my-laptops-hard-disk_15.html' title='Upgrading my laptop&apos;s hard disk: Postscript to the addendum'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-8350302968919008068</id><published>2009-10-14T22:36:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-14T22:45:08.311-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Upgrading a laptop hard disk: Addendum</title><summary type='text'>In my summary of lessons learned, I think I failed to mention the most important lesson of all. That is, it's a mistake to think you can simply clone an 80GB drive to a 500GB drive, swap the drives, and go about your business. Next time I do this, I think I will do it like this:Make sure I have a good backup of all the documents on the old hard drive. By "documents," I mean my photos, databases, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/8350302968919008068'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/8350302968919008068'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/10/upgrading-laptop-hard-disk-addendum.html' title='Upgrading a laptop hard disk: Addendum'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-5289195039642673124</id><published>2009-10-13T08:34:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-14T19:41:39.285-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Upgrading my laptop's hard disk</title><summary type='text'>I work on several computers, but the one I work on most - the one I do most of my database work on, as well as all of my photo editing - is a Latitude D820. I don't know what I was thinking of when I bought a laptop with an 80GB hard drive, but it soon became clear to me that 80GB wasn't enough. After thinking about it for a long time, two days ago I finally got around to doing something about </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5289195039642673124'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5289195039642673124'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/10/upgrading-my-laptops-hard-disk.html' title='Upgrading my laptop&apos;s hard disk'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6564201832413031418</id><published>2009-03-02T11:03:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-02T11:03:35.099-06:00</updated><title type='text'>It's Casimir Pulaski day!</title><summary type='text'>Here's a holiday that I seldom celebrate: General Casimir Pulaski Day!Pulaski was a brilliant Polish cavalryman who volunteered his services to General Washington during the Revolutionary War. He died from injuries suffered during one of his engagements but not before distinguishing himself and coming to be recognized as the Father of American Cavalry. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6564201832413031418'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6564201832413031418'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/03/it-casimir-pulaski-day.html' title='It&amp;#39;s Casimir Pulaski day!'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6164629343851329459</id><published>2009-02-18T12:30:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T12:37:27.460-06:00</updated><title type='text'>T-Mobile Dance</title><summary type='text'>I could bring up Intelligent Design here, but I won't. Let me just say that, if this doesn't put a smile on your face, well, God bless you. Be sure to watch in high quality.T-Mobile Dance on YouTube</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6164629343851329459'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6164629343851329459'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/02/t-mobile-dance.html' title='T-Mobile Dance'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-2084087318093931186</id><published>2009-02-09T23:38:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-09T23:38:36.044-06:00</updated><title type='text'>G1 photography with Snap Photo</title><summary type='text'>This photo of my dining room was taken with the G1 using Snap Photo rather than the default Camera app. Post processing in Pic Say. Snap Photo uses the G1's accelerometer (!) to provide digital image stabilization. Seems to work. Keep in mind that this was a low-light challenge. No flash, no sunlight, just one incandescent light. I adjusted saturation in Pic Say but color in the original shot was</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2084087318093931186'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2084087318093931186'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/02/g1-photography-with-snap-photo.html' title='G1 photography with Snap Photo'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/SZES3FYaM7I/AAAAAAAABs0/Es3nu0UEtm8/s72-c/picsay-1234242952876-716046.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-5355799503238481824</id><published>2009-02-08T11:08:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-08T11:08:54.348-06:00</updated><title type='text'>A better browser for Android: Steel</title><summary type='text'>Haven't gotten the 1.1 firmware update yet, but I am happy to have discovered something really good for Android: the Steel browser.  http://kolbysoft.com Steel has a touch-screen interface, including an on-screen keyboard. I still don't want to type a lot on a virtual keyboard, but it's very useful to have the option for, say, entering a url or password. Steel also displays pages really nicely. I</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5355799503238481824'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5355799503238481824'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/02/better-browser-for-android-steel.html' title='A better browser for Android: Steel'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-3166186713755929329</id><published>2009-02-07T11:39:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-07T11:46:57.241-06:00</updated><title type='text'>You don't have to be a tech genius to outsmart malware</title><summary type='text'>The other day while Penelope was surfing the Web, she suddenly saw a scary screen saying the computer was infected and asking her to take action. She handed the computer to me. Here's what we saw:Notice that the presentation looks "official," but is in fact completely generic. Next we got the following messages:Behind the dialog in front there is a dialog with the even more official-looking title</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3166186713755929329'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3166186713755929329'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/02/you-don-have-to-be-tech-genius-to.html' title='You don&amp;#39;t have to be a tech genius to outsmart malware'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh5.ggpht.com/_69C_2aW43co/SY3CKj5hCkI/AAAAAAAABss/E2uTUF9mlq0/s72-c/%5BUNSET%5D.png?imgmax=800' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6100504837669427451</id><published>2009-02-05T10:00:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-02-05T10:00:15.512-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Speed Dial add-on for Firefox 3</title><summary type='text'>Speed Dial - GalleryOne of the things I liked about Google's new browser, Chrome, is the way it displays thumbnails of my most frequently visited pages when I open a new tab. But there was a lot to dislike about Chrome, as well. First, Chrome displayed 9 thumbnails only. Second, it didn't ever seem to update them. Third, I had no control over what thumbnails were displayed. And I should add, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6100504837669427451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6100504837669427451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2009/02/speed-dial-add-on-for-firefox-3.html' title='Speed Dial add-on for Firefox 3'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh6.ggpht.com/_69C_2aW43co/SYsL2v5gr4I/AAAAAAAABso/xjRNoWqNwCY/s72-c/%5BUNSET%5D.png?imgmax=800' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-5296974165140420956</id><published>2008-12-18T13:56:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-12-18T13:56:36.044-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Carbonite works!</title><summary type='text'>I'm still not sure what I did, but somehow, while I was working on my to-do list (a FileMaker database), I accidentally deleted all of the active task records. Gack! I'm a slave to that database. Without those records, I'm not a freed slave: I'm a slave without a clue what to do.But did I panic? I did not. I went to http://carbonite.com, logged in, and in two or three seconds I learned how to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5296974165140420956'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5296974165140420956'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/12/carbonite-works.html' title='Carbonite works!'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-202648303401291798</id><published>2008-11-19T10:37:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-19T10:41:09.787-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The compact camera I would buy today if I had any money: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3K</title><summary type='text'>Of course there's no such thing as an absolute best compact camera, but for my own needs these days, if I were buying a compact, this may be the one I'd get: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3K. I've heard rumors about it coming - PopPhoto.com had a preview of this camera back in July - and I just became aware that it's out by reading an actual review in the dead-trees edition of Pop Photography (October </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/202648303401291798'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/202648303401291798'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/compact-camera-i-would-buy-today-if-i.html' title='The compact camera I would buy today if I had any money: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3K'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-8383244666353263645</id><published>2008-11-14T11:01:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-14T11:01:15.483-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Followup re TooDo on Android</title><summary type='text'>I was delighted this morning to find an email in my inbox from Edouard Mercier, the smart programmer who created TooDo, the powerful task management app for Android that I mentioned (and criticized) in yesterday's post. I was delighted to hear from him, because it's clear that he really wants to make TooDo better. I have offered a few more of my own personal suggestions for him to consider, and I</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/8383244666353263645'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/8383244666353263645'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/followup-re-toodo-on-android.html' title='Followup re TooDo on Android'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6140515913395277872</id><published>2008-11-14T00:49:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-14T00:59:31.254-06:00</updated><title type='text'>To-do list options for the T-Mobile G1 (Android OS)</title><summary type='text'>I've found a couple of to-do lists for the Android OS.First, I tried TooDo from Edouard Mercier. This was my first choice because it claims to be able to sync tasks with the excellent and very powerful online to-do manager, Toodledo, which I've been using for about a year now. (It also syncs with Remember the Milk, another popular online task management service that I have never used.) In </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6140515913395277872'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6140515913395277872'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/to-do-list-options-for-t-mobile-g1.html' title='To-do list options for the T-Mobile G1 (Android OS)'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7772020901706083984</id><published>2008-11-11T15:50:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-11T15:50:08.218-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Integrated Gmail - more about why open source rocks</title><summary type='text'>Earlier today I was reading an article about add-ons for Firefox that mentioned something called Integrated Gmail. After visiting the web page for the Integrated Gmail add-on (here), I downloaded it and gave it a try. It's quite nice.With the add-on installed and configured, I'm able to get access to my mail, Google calendar, and Picasa, all on the same web page. In the screen shot above, notice </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7772020901706083984'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7772020901706083984'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/integrated-gmail-more-about-why-open.html' title='Integrated Gmail - more about why open source rocks'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh5.ggpht.com/_69C_2aW43co/SRn8OG8rexI/AAAAAAAABm4/kSr4xtiUYYI/s72-c/%5BUNSET%5D.png?imgmax=800' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-969561906582051782</id><published>2008-11-09T17:53:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-09T17:53:07.632-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Android talks my language</title><summary type='text'>I was pleased yesterday to discover that many common abbreviations (I've, can't, won't, they're and many others) can be typed in Android without the apostrophe: when you hit the space key, Android adds the apostrophe for you.  But I was really tickled this afternoon when I discovered that one of the abbreviations Android expands automatically is y'all. Very cool! </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/969561906582051782'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/969561906582051782'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/android-talks-my-language.html' title='Android talks my language'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-4087238260906042277</id><published>2008-11-09T12:01:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-09T12:20:02.393-06:00</updated><title type='text'>T-Mobile G1 + Google Android = Something Close to Happiness</title><summary type='text'>I have been reluctant to move to a "smart phone". I am not eager to do a lot of typing on a teeny keyboard, so I am not eager to use a phone for email. I also dislike the idea of being "in touch" 24/7. And I did not want to be tied to a specific email service. For these reasons, I was never attracted to the Blackberry. I liked the Apple iPhone much more. But the iPhone has been too expensive, and</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4087238260906042277'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4087238260906042277'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/t-mobile-g1-google-android-something.html' title='T-Mobile G1 + Google Android = Something Close to Happiness'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-1614837684136695328</id><published>2008-11-08T23:41:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-08T23:41:49.604-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Quick note about typing on the G1 phone</title><summary type='text'>I find the keyboard on the T-Mobile G1 "smart phone" a tad awkward to use. After all, I am a 110+ wpm touch typist when I can use all 10 of my fingers. Typing with my thumbs is frustratingly slow. But I am getting a little more comfortable with the keyboard every day and already I am able to type faster than I expected to be able to, and I make fewer mistakes than I thought I would.  I think it's</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1614837684136695328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1614837684136695328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/quick-note-about-typing-on-g1-phone.html' title='Quick note about typing on the G1 phone'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7366051066267218452</id><published>2008-11-08T22:37:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-08T22:37:59.505-06:00</updated><title type='text'>First post from my phone</title><summary type='text'>Here's a pic of my daughter and her friend. This message was written in Gmail on my T-Mobile G1 and automatically posted by email. This must be how Instapundit does it - and now I understand why he keeps his posts short. My thumbs are getting sore!  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7366051066267218452'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7366051066267218452'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/first-post-from-my-phone.html' title='First post from my phone'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/SRZpKOxmBeI/AAAAAAAABl8/2WyJ1zjVJZk/s72-c/1225908406951-779508.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-4793545965764755922</id><published>2008-11-08T13:21:00.014-06:00</published><updated>2008-11-08T16:54:32.902-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Do you dare hike to the bottom of the Grand Canyon?</title><summary type='text'>Just got back from a wonderful trip with my wife to the Grand Canyon. We arrived on Friday, October 31, 2008. Hiked down the South Kaibab trail to the river on Saturday, spent two nights camping at the bottom of the canyon, then hiked back up the Bright Angel trail on Monday, November 3. When we did this together over a decade ago, we hiked down one day, and back up the next. This time, we spent </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4793545965764755922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4793545965764755922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/11/do-you-dare-hike-to-bottom-of-grand.html' title='Do you dare hike to the bottom of the Grand Canyon?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh5.ggpht.com/_E63StVg0FS8/SRH17N-vvyI/AAAAAAAAFdk/tPye4Et7RRU/s72-c/K20D0868.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-2628881913886265982</id><published>2008-09-24T19:46:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-24T19:46:19.033-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Hooray: Picasa 3 supports Pentax raw files</title><summary type='text'>I just realized that Picasa 3 supports Pentax raw (.PEF) files. Earlier versions of Picasa were able to display the PEF files generated by my Pentax K10D and K20D, but Picasa could not read the EXIF info. Now it can. This is good news. All important photos go through Adobe Lightroom, but this requires some effort, because I have to attach the big hard drive to my laptop. But I take a lot of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2628881913886265982'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2628881913886265982'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/09/hooray-picasa-3-supports-pentax-raw.html' title='Hooray: Picasa 3 supports Pentax raw files'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-913125569102641041</id><published>2008-09-24T10:06:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-24T10:06:12.373-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Chrome 1 no threat to Firefox 3</title><summary type='text'>I've been using Google's new browser - named "Chrome" - ever since the day it was released a couple of weeks ago. Chrome is cute, but that's about all I can say in its favor. I'm going to stick with Firefox 3 for now. Firefox is a very mature and capable browser with a terrific feature set; Chrome is an immature application with a very limited feature set. One key difference: Firefox supports </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/913125569102641041'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/913125569102641041'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/09/chrome-1-no-threat-to-firefox-3_24.html' title='Chrome 1 no threat to Firefox 3'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-693661938947396178</id><published>2008-07-29T18:50:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T22:31:45.224-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Lightroom 2 released</title><summary type='text'>Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 was released today. It's not earth-shattering news for those of us who have been using the public beta since last spring. But the beta had a few bugs and the final release adds some new features that weren't in the beta. And with today's official release, I can finally combine my old Lightroom 1.x photo collection with the photos I have edited in the last four months </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/693661938947396178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/693661938947396178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/07/lightroom-2-released.html' title='Lightroom 2 released'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/SI-_2oaDc2I/AAAAAAAABXw/_KjzzjmGfgY/s72-c/WMBP9920-small-2.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-1565837519304346933</id><published>2008-07-09T18:16:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-09T23:29:24.543-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Photoshop vs Lightroom</title><summary type='text'>The question of Photoshop vs the alternatives seems to come up in online forums more often these days, especially as the alternatives to Photoshop get more and more sophisticated. The question is often directed specifically at the difference between Photoshop and the program that Adobe very confusingly calls "Photoshop Lightroom". So I've gathered my thoughts on the matter here.Use Photoshop to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1565837519304346933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1565837519304346933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/07/photoshop-vs-lightroom.html' title='Photoshop vs Lightroom'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-289659885638951520</id><published>2008-07-03T16:19:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-03T16:49:28.210-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Nikon's coming D700 and full-frame frenzy</title><summary type='text'>Over at pentaxforums.com, there's been a lot of chatter about when Pentax is going to release a full-frame body to compete with Nikon and Canon. With Nikon set to release its second full-frame camera very soon (the D700) and at a price (around $3000) that sounds more like a new computer than a new car, this chatter is likely to increase. To some posters, a Pentax full-frame camera seems necessary</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/289659885638951520'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/289659885638951520'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/07/nikons-coming-d700-and-full-frame.html' title='Nikon&apos;s coming D700 and full-frame frenzy'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7403103255063715140</id><published>2008-04-23T23:28:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-04-24T00:29:16.133-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Correcting perspectival distortion</title><summary type='text'>Noticeable perspectival distortion occurs now and then in my photos and I recently decided I should do something about it. This prompted me to think a little about when distortion matters and when it doesn't.Here's a simple example of where it matters. This is a shot of my wife and daughter, standing outside our front door.Notice that the edges of the door frame are not parallel to the edges of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7403103255063715140'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7403103255063715140'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/04/correcting-perspectival-distortion.html' title='Correcting perspectival distortion'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://lh3.ggpht.com/wmb.porter/SBALYEiqfhI/AAAAAAAALhE/LDtNK9r8Ggk/s72-c/20080202-0894-lz.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-3363878266134181404</id><published>2008-02-01T17:34:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-02-01T18:01:27.282-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>            Katz Eye focusing screen I now have a Katz Eye focusing screen in my Pentax K10D and I'm very happy with it. When I got my first DSLR in 2006 (the Pentax K100D) I was pleased to see that the optical finder was so much brighter than the digital finder in my previous compact camera, the Canon PowerShot S3 IS. But I was disappointed that the K100D lacked a split-prism focusing screen </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3363878266134181404'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3363878266134181404'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2008/02/katz-eye-focusing-screen-i-now-have.html' title=''/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-7826141146559193257</id><published>2007-11-30T15:41:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-12-01T10:07:19.662-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Lightroom and Lightzone</title><summary type='text'>I finally broke down and purchased Light Crafts LightZone photo editor. I've tried several previous demos but didn't buy for various reasons. In the past, I thought it was too expensive and too slow, and I had trouble really "getting" what LightZone is all about. Well, they had a sale this month (November 2007) that brought the price down. And I saw some video clips that demonstrate a couple of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7826141146559193257'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/7826141146559193257'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/11/lightroom-and-lightzone.html' title='Lightroom and Lightzone'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/R1CM634aAqI/AAAAAAAAAgg/6epBjDaSs70/s72-c/lightroom_tone_curve.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6607277365982025928</id><published>2007-07-10T00:40:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-07-10T00:59:49.886-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photography'/><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>My brother-in-law Tom and I were talking about depth of field yesterday. We disagreed - but it turns out we were both right. Tom said that the generally greater depth of field in compact cameras is a function of the smaller sensor size. I said that I thought that it wasn't the sensor size, but the smaller focal lengths of the lenses that matters.Well,  I've browsed around on the web this evening </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6607277365982025928'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6607277365982025928'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-brother-in-law-tom-and-i-were.html' title=''/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-5469991436152827694</id><published>2007-07-05T14:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-07-05T15:23:04.973-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Fireworks!</title><summary type='text'>We watched fireworks last night. That the fireworks display actually happened is remarkable in itself, given the unending rain we've had here in Dallas for weeks and weeks. Our neighborhood's Independence Day parade - an ancient tradition - was canceled due to weather. But late in the evening, the rain let up and the skies cleared for a while, so decided to go. On the way out the door, I grabbed </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5469991436152827694'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/5469991436152827694'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/07/fireworks.html' title='Fireworks!'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/Ro1TCHT4rBI/AAAAAAAAAUM/b5Tlo5sVux0/s72-c/20070704-IMGP4782-fireworks3.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-3098858206248387854</id><published>2007-05-18T00:12:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2007-05-18T00:38:04.780-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Look sharp, be sharp</title><summary type='text'>I frequently find myself wishing my photos were sharper. Now, I don't mean to make too much of sharpness. I know that focus and sharpness are not quite the same thing. I know that composition and exposure (and an interesting subject) are more important for the kind of photography I do than sharpness. Still, I've been wondering lately if I could get my shots to be sharper.The answer seems to be </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3098858206248387854'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/3098858206248387854'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/05/look-sharp-be-sharp.html' title='Look sharp, be sharp'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_69C_2aW43co/Rk038im34fI/AAAAAAAAANg/H8oXlFLbY6Y/s72-c/IMGP0915.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-2698707449396878964</id><published>2007-04-25T17:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-04-25T18:03:39.745-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photography'/><title type='text'>Prime vs zoom</title><summary type='text'>In a recent thread at pentaxforums.com, there was a bit of back and forth discussion about the merits of prime (fixed-focal length) lenses versus zoom lenses. The old view - from decades ago - was that primes were superior and zooms were not so good. That's simply not true any more.Here are just a couple comparison shots taken by my K10D using (a) the Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4, and (b) the Tamron 28-</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2698707449396878964'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/2698707449396878964'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/04/prime-vs-zoom.html' title='Prime vs zoom'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-6209880123777213076</id><published>2007-02-09T16:52:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-04-25T18:04:26.743-05:00</updated><title type='text'>David and Goliath: Lightzone vs Lightroom</title><summary type='text'>Two things happen in ten days and the combination of the two is making me very nervous. First, Adobe Lightroom version 1 will finally be released. Second, my 30-day trial version of Lightcrafts' Lightzone will expire. I should perhaps add that only a week after that, the beta of Lightroom that I've been using for a couple of months also expires. So I can make it to the end of the month. But by </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6209880123777213076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/6209880123777213076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/02/david-and-goliath-lightzone-vs.html' title='David and Goliath: Lightzone vs Lightroom'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-1953791712058605460</id><published>2006-12-20T22:18:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-12-20T22:26:49.254-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photography'/><title type='text'>More musings on the differences between digital SLRs and compact cameras</title><summary type='text'>Sigh, my Canon PowerShot S3 IS is now off to Akron, Ohio, along with the two lovely converter lenses. Yep, sold it on eBay. I'm feeling very comfortable with the new Pentax K100D digital SLR, but I feel like I'm finally coming to a balanced appreciation of what the different cameras can do. Here are a few more random observations.1. I mentioned in my last post that that digital SLR's glass </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1953791712058605460'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/1953791712058605460'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/12/more-musings-on-differences-between.html' title='More musings on the differences between digital SLRs and compact cameras'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-4633616084693126863</id><published>2006-12-12T22:28:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-12-19T16:46:26.780-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photography'/><title type='text'>Superzoom vs DSLR, Revisited</title><summary type='text'>A month ago, I tried to gather up my thoughts on the question of whether I should stick with the Canon S3 IS superzoom compact digital camera or consider purchasing one of the recently released, relatively low-price digital SLRS. In that earlier post I took a position that I suppose could fairly be called defensive. I had already purchased the S3. Now I was trying to persuade myself that I had </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4633616084693126863'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4633616084693126863'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/12/superzoom-vs-dslr-revisited.html' title='Superzoom vs DSLR, Revisited'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-4339418720157054150</id><published>2006-11-26T11:28:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-26T21:30:47.409-06:00</updated><title type='text'>One of the funniest movies ever made?</title><summary type='text'>I've been looking forward to the release of the Borat movie for months. I've seen several clips of the Borat character (played by Sacha Baron Cohen) on YouTube and I thought them hilarious. When I read the reviews of the movie, my eagerness was heightened. John Podhoretz, for example, writing for the Weekly Standard, declared it "one of the four or five funniest films ever made." I like Podhoretz</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4339418720157054150'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/4339418720157054150'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/one-of-funniest-movies-ever-made.html' title='One of the funniest movies ever made?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-255179823542335471</id><published>2006-11-15T01:10:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-19T16:35:57.984-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photography'/><title type='text'>What to buy: compact superzoom or dslr?</title><summary type='text'>Superzoom or DSLR? Should I buy a digital single-lens reflex (dslr) camera or a high-end point and shoot camera? I ask the question for myself, but you may be asking the same question. I speak as a moderately serious hobbyist, which is to say, I am emphatically not a professional photographer. I want to add further that this essay has a heavy undertow of special pleading. I have already made my </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/255179823542335471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/255179823542335471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-to-buy-compact-superzoom-or-dslr.html' title='What to buy: compact superzoom or dslr?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116354347906561135</id><published>2006-11-14T16:31:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:49:03.357-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Coming Zune. No, wait a minute. It's here.</title><summary type='text'>As far as I can tell, Microsoft's Zune music player is creating no splash at all. PC Magazine's web site doesn't mention the product at all on its front page today. PC World gives it a positive review, but the upshot of the review is signaled in the title: "Microsoft's Zune Won't Make You Dump Your iPod." Ouch. John Dvorak agrees, the machine is doomed to fail.I'm sure somebody out there, perhaps</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116354347906561135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116354347906561135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/as-far-as-i-can-tell-microsofts-zune.html' title='Coming Zune. No, wait a minute. It&apos;s here.'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116300585897864880</id><published>2006-11-08T11:10:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.555-06:00</updated><title type='text'>How to steal a (digital) election</title><summary type='text'>For those who have no idea of how the high-tech voting process can be hacked, there is an excellent article   over at Ars Technica, perhaps the best computer site on the Internet. Actually, it's a great article even if you do have an idea how this would be done.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116300585897864880'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116300585897864880'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/how-to-steal-digital-election.html' title='How to steal a (digital) election'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116293639690015116</id><published>2006-11-07T15:16:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.487-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Keep Democracy low tech!</title><summary type='text'> In a blog entry over two years ago, I said that only two kinds of people are in favor of electronic or computerized voting machines: people who are selling electronic or computerized voting machines; and people who know nothing about computers. I was wrong. There are three types of people who favor these devices: the two I just mentioned, and a third group - people who don't understand </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116293639690015116'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116293639690015116'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/keep-democracy-low-tech.html' title='Keep Democracy low tech!'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116291932729060740</id><published>2006-11-07T11:08:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.418-06:00</updated><title type='text'>What about your albums?</title><summary type='text'>   When you use a photo management program like Picasa or iPhoto or Photoshop Elements, there are basically three kinds of things you can do. First, you can edit the photo files themselves, for example, by cropping the image or fixing the contrast or color. Second, you can add "metadata" to the images, for example, captions and keywords. Third, you can organize your images into sets or groupings </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116291932729060740'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116291932729060740'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-about-your-albums.html' title='What about your albums?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116283688274360693</id><published>2006-11-06T12:14:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.326-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>   Few quick addenda to my earlier post entitled "Organizing those photos!"      First, Adobe Photoshop Elements 5 is available for purchase now, at least for Windows. As far as I can tell, the latest version for Mac OS X is still 4. My recollection is that version 4 for the Mac appeared a little after 4 for Windows, so I would assume that 5 for Mac will follow soon.      An old academic friend </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116283688274360693'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116283688274360693'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/few-quick-addenda-to-my-earlier-post.html' title=''/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-116267216720984311</id><published>2006-11-04T14:29:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.180-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Organizing those photos!</title><summary type='text'>   I'm struggling once again with the problem of how to organize my growing photo collection and you might be, too. There are at least two questions here. First, what software (if any) to use, and second, what do to with that software. I've used various photo management apps over the years. I'm going to focus on just three: iPhoto 5, Picasa 2.5 and Adobe Photoshop Elements 4. (I have not used </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116267216720984311'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/116267216720984311'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/11/organizing-those-photos.html' title='Organizing those photos!'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115506075312507721</id><published>2006-08-08T12:54:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.107-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Beta dogs</title><summary type='text'>FileMaker, Inc., has released a "public beta" of its own API for FileMaker Server Advanced and PHP:http://filemaker.com/developers/resources/php/index.htmlBut that's not what I want to talk about.Today, on a list frequented by FileMaker developers, I saw a note from someone asking if it was safe to use this beta for production work, that is, on a "real" web site with real users. This rather </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115506075312507721'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115506075312507721'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/08/beta-dogs.html' title='Beta dogs'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115438080038094384</id><published>2006-07-31T16:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:40.039-06:00</updated><title type='text'>SBCYahoo DSL: Shouldn't this be easier?</title><summary type='text'>Popped over to my mother's house last night, expecting to spend 15 minutes upgrading her Internet connection from dialup to dsl from SBC/Yahoo! I've done this so many times I could do it in my sleep: install the filters on all lines, install the dsl modem itself and connect it properly both to the incoming phone jack and to the computer, open the computer and set the Internet preference to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115438080038094384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115438080038094384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/sbcyahoo-dsl-shouldnt-this-be-easier.html' title='SBCYahoo DSL: Shouldn&apos;t this be easier?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115403813577383190</id><published>2006-07-27T17:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.962-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Coming Zune?</title><summary type='text'>I've criticized the Apple ads and enjoyed parodies of them here, so I guess it's fair to link to a piece of online video that imagines what Microsoft might do when it tries to copy the iPod - but put its distinctive mark on the copy. Click here to view; warning - has sound. It would be funnier if it weren't so realistic.But Microsoft might be changing its M.O. For what it's worth, here's the "</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115403813577383190'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115403813577383190'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/coming-zune.html' title='Coming Zune?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115386565731079449</id><published>2006-07-24T17:13:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.718-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Time to dump the desktop?</title><summary type='text'>The lead article in the Technology section of today's Wall Street Journal today (July 24, 2006) is titled, "Is it Time to Dump Your Desktop?" It's interesting to see the question being asked so prominently, but the answer offered in the article is somewhat disappointing - perhaps because the question, as asked, is premature.The WSJ stacks the deck heavily in favor of the desktop by focusing on </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386565731079449'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386565731079449'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/time-to-dump-desktop.html' title='Time to dump the desktop?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115386550942496095</id><published>2006-07-24T15:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.639-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Gmail domain hosting</title><summary type='text'>Gmail domain hostingPublished 7/24/2006Some months ago, I learned that Google was initiating a beta of its new hosted-domain email service for small businesses. I applied for admission to the beta immediately, got accepted, and I've now been using the new service for a full week. Do I like it? Yes, I like it a lot. Actually, I feel like I've finally fully entered the twenty-first century.Why did </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386550942496095'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386550942496095'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/gmail-domain-hosting.html' title='Gmail domain hosting'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115392763192856366</id><published>2006-07-19T10:26:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.002-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Windows XP Self-Help</title><summary type='text'>I must be getting the hang of Windows. Tonight, I solved not one, but two problems with my computer that Dell Tech Support gave up on.Problem 1: Can't set desktop backgroundI couldn't change my desktop picture or "background" as it's called in Windows. I'd right click on the desktop, click on the Desktop tab of the Display Properties dialog,  click the Browse button, find and select a photograph </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392763192856366'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392763192856366'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/windows-xp-self-help.html' title='Windows XP Self-Help'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115392904429536394</id><published>2006-07-13T10:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.271-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Macs still no go in business?</title><summary type='text'>According to Macworld online (7/7/06), computer industry analysts predict that the ability of Macs to run Windows well (either via Parallels or Boot Camp) isn't going to do much to increase the market share of Macs in the business world.No surprise here.I will say it again: While there may be a reason for Macs to want to run Windows, there's virtually no reason for somebody with a Windows machine</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392904429536394'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392904429536394'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/macs-still-no-go-in-business.html' title='Macs still no go in business?'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115392782420051134</id><published>2006-07-13T10:30:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.090-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Apple Ads: What goes around, comes around</title><summary type='text'>I learned about this from an article at PC World online by Narasa Rebbapragada, who learned about it from an article at Engadget, which in turn got it from somewhere else. Anyway, it's legit, funny, and inevitable: a spoof of the recent Apple television ads in which the roles of the Mac and the PC are played by two human beings. The spoof shows just how obnoxious the Apple guy is. You'll have to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392782420051134'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392782420051134'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/07/apple-ads-what-goes-around-comes.html' title='Apple Ads: What goes around, comes around'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115386591348269554</id><published>2006-06-10T17:16:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.829-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Web vs Desktop</title><summary type='text'>A colleague of mine brought to my attention a newsletter article from a small computer reseller that reports that the Web is posing at least a small threat to Microsoft. The article notes that, with the beta release of Google's spreadsheet and with the earlier announcement that Google had acquired Writely, an online word processor, Microsoft's key desktop apps have some competition from the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386591348269554'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386591348269554'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/06/web-vs-desktop.html' title='Web vs Desktop'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115392834824543590</id><published>2006-06-06T10:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.179-06:00</updated><title type='text'>FireFTP</title><summary type='text'>I went to the Firefox extensions page to add Crusty.com to my preferred search engines, and I ran across something wonderful: FireFTP - a full-featured FTP client that works inside Firefox.As you probably know, I'm now working 90% or more of the time in Windows, and I don't miss much about the Mac. But one of the few things I do miss is Panic Software's outstanding FTP client, Transmit. I've been</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392834824543590'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115392834824543590'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/06/fireftp.html' title='FireFTP'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402183833636665</id><published>2006-05-17T12:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.478-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Me and the core duo</title><summary type='text'>So I've now upgraded to a Dell Latitude D820. It's got a Core Duo chip, 2 GB of RAM, a bigger (and higher-res) display, a thinner body and a somewhat more stylish look than the Latitude D610 it replaces. Here's a review from PC Magazine:http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1943236,00.aspAnd here are a couple of pictures from C|net:http://news.com.com/2300-1005_3-6055430-1.html?tag=ne.gall.pgNote </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402183833636665'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402183833636665'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/05/me-and-core-duo.html' title='Me and the core duo'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402195603617212</id><published>2006-05-16T12:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.562-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Hardware vs Software</title><summary type='text'>Tech writer Molly Wood on the C|net blog notes that it's one thing to be able to boot Windows on a MacBook or MacBook Pro, it's another thing to be able to use it.http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6527287.html?tag=cnetfd.blogShe focuses on the Mac line's lack of a two-button mouse. This isn't quite right. Apple makes the Mighty Mouse, which I have written favorably about in the past and which </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402195603617212'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402195603617212'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/05/hardware-vs-software.html' title='Hardware vs Software'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402215303191352</id><published>2006-05-02T12:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.649-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Dan Brown's Apple</title><summary type='text'>I read Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code when it came out. I was at that time coming to the end of my academic detoxification - or rather retoxification - program, the program in which I was reading all the crap that I'd failed to keep up with during the previous quarter of a century. A sales person at Barnes &amp; Noble had suggested the book as a good read, and he was right. I read the book straight </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402215303191352'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402215303191352'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/05/dan-browns-apple.html' title='Dan Brown&apos;s Apple'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115386626033875253</id><published>2006-04-29T17:23:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.904-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Bootcamp and the future of the Mac OS</title><summary type='text'>Bootcamp and the future of the MacPublished originally on Typepad 4/29/06A couple of weeks ago, Apple released the cleverly named BootCamp, a utility that makes it not only possible but fairly easy to run Windows (XP SP2) on a new Mac with an Intel chip. Like many of Apple’s moves in the last few years, this one has attracted a lot of attention from the computer press. We have to assume that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386626033875253'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115386626033875253'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/04/bootcamp-and-future-of-mac-os.html' title='Bootcamp and the future of the Mac OS'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402226043935378</id><published>2006-04-28T12:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.741-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Installing Microsoft Office</title><summary type='text'>Yesterday, in the early afternoon, I broke down and bought the latest version of Microsoft Office 2003, Professional Edition, for Windows XP. I need Excel for some FileMaker work, and I finally got tired of using OpenOffice. Unfortunately, the installation process has been very difficult.Around 2:00, I logged out of my normal (limited-privileges) user account, logged into my administrator account</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402226043935378'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402226043935378'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2006/04/installing-microsoft-office.html' title='Installing Microsoft Office'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-113106577696195626</id><published>2005-11-03T18:55:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.296-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Grand Canyon</title><summary type='text'> Just sharing my desktop picture. I've tweaked it very gently in Picasa. Boy, I wish I could step away from my computer and go back to where I was standing on the North Rim in August when I took this shot.And stay there.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113106577696195626'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113106577696195626'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/11/grand-canyon.html' title='Grand Canyon'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-113099526713040471</id><published>2005-11-02T22:58:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.222-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Switching</title><summary type='text'>.I may be losing my faith. No, not in the important way. I'm sticking with Rome on that score. I'm simply referring to my faith in Apple. Ten days ago I bought a Dell laptop running Windows XP Professional. I've used it all day every day since then. And I like it.It's not (very) ugly (anymore)!I have mixed feelings about XP blue. But the real problem with Windows - especially compared to the Mac </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113099526713040471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113099526713040471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/11/switching.html' title='Switching'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-113070373790354744</id><published>2005-10-30T14:19:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:38.139-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Email in the 21st century</title><summary type='text'>I have a dilemma that is driving me crazy, now that I'm using 2 computers pretty actively. The problem is, how to deal with email: move to the web or stick with the desktop?Web mail's pros and consIt seems to me that, other things being equal, storing my mail on a remote (Internet) server is superior to downloading it and storing it on a laptop and deleting the messages from the POP server after </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113070373790354744'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/113070373790354744'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/10/email-in-21st-century.html' title='Email in the 21st century'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402172036836826</id><published>2005-09-17T12:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.356-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Mighty Mouse Indeed</title><summary type='text'>I finally got my hands on the new Mighty Mouse from Apple. And I love it.A lot of people are rather surprised that Apple would cave in and release a two-button mouse. Apple has never made a two button mouse before, and it's generally been understood that Apple (i.e. Steve Jobs) believes two-button mice are a bad UI/design concept.But the Mighty Mouse is not a two-button mouse. It's a one-button </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402172036836826'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402172036836826'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/09/mighty-mouse-indeed.html' title='Mighty Mouse Indeed'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402365232964677</id><published>2005-06-16T13:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.890-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Parental Controls (Mac OS)</title><summary type='text'>Mac OS X.4 ("Tiger") gives parents some control over a young child's experience of the Internet. This is good.I just gave Catherine, our ten-year old, her own email account, so she can communicate with her older sisters, who are away from home now, and so she can get some more experience reading and writing. I would like to exercise some control over her use of the email account and I don't want </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402365232964677'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402365232964677'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/06/parental-controls-mac-os.html' title='Parental Controls (Mac OS)'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18467701.post-115402271220046735</id><published>2005-01-06T12:51:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-11-14T16:36:39.816-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Showing Up</title><summary type='text'>“Eighty percent of success in life is showing up.” Woody AllenWhen I started blogging earlier this year, my goal was to post a new article at least once a week. I kept it up for a short while. Then I got busy. I stopped showing up.I take no comfort in the thought, but I’m not alone. There are a lot of us “little” bloggers, like me and my friend Kirk Samuelson, who aren’t pressured by the thought </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402271220046735'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18467701/posts/default/115402271220046735'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://ulyssesatlarge.blogspot.com/2005/01/showing-up.html' title='Showing Up'/><author><name>William Porter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12239624429096629272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
